WK 7 HW FIN 550 – savvyessaywriters.net | Savvy Essay Writers
WK 7 HW FIN 550 – savvyessaywriters.net | Savvy Essay Writers
Savvy Essay Writers Business & Finance Assignment Help
Homework Chapter 14 week 7PROBLEM 6: Lauren Entertainment, Inc., has an 18 percent annual growth rate compared to the market rate of 8 percent. If the market multiple is 18, determine P/E ratios for Lauren Entertainment, Inc., assuming its beta is 1.0 and you feel t can maintain its superior growth rate for:a. The next 10 yearsb. The next 5 yearsPROBLEM 7: You are given the following information about two computer software firms and the S&P Industrials—————————-Company A——————-Company B————–S & P IndustrialsP/E Ratio 30.00 27.00 18.00Expected annual growth rate 0.18 0.15 0.07Dividend yield 0.00 0.01 0.02a. Compute the growth duration of each company stock relative to the S & P Industrials.b.c. Given these growth durations, what determines your investment decision?Problem 8: The value of an asset is the present value of the expected returns from the asset during the holding period. An investment will provide a stream of returns during this period, and it is necessary to discount this stream of returns at an appropriate rate to determine the set’s present value. A dividend valuation model such as the following is frequently used. Pi= D1—————–(k i- gi)WherePi = the current price of Common Stock iD1 = the expected dividend in period 1Ki = the required rate of return on Stock iGi = the expected constant-growth rate of dividends for Stock ia. Identify the three factors that must be estimated for any valuation model, and explain why these estimates are more difficult to derive for common stocks than for bonds.b. Explain the principal problem involved in using a dividend valuation model to value,(1) Companies whose operations are closely correlated with economic cycles.(2) Companies that are of very large and mature.(3) Companies that are quite small and are growing rapidly.Assume that all companies pay dividend.PROBLEM 10: The constant growth dividend discount model can be used both for the valuation of companies and for the estimation of the long-term term total return of a stock.Assume $ 20=Price of a Stock Today8%= Expected Growth Rate of Dividend0.60=Annual Dividend One Year Forwarda. Using only the preceding data, compute the expected long-term total return on the stock using the constant-growth dividend discount model.c. Identify three alternative methods to the dividend discount model for the valuation of companies.PROBLEM 11: An analyst expects a risk-free return of 4.5 percent, a market of 14.5 percent, and the return for Stocks A and B that are show in Exhibit 14.24.EXHIBIT 14.24 STOCK INFORMATIONSTOCK BETA Analyst’s Estimated ReturnA 1.2 16%B 0.8 14%a. Show on a graph:(1) Where Stocks A and B would plot on the security market line (SML) if they were fairly value using the capital asset pricing model (CAMP).(2) Where Stocks A and B actually plot on the same graph according to the return estimated by the analyst and shown in Exhibit 14.24.b. State whether Stock A and B are undervalued if the analyst uses the SML for strategic investment decisionsPROBLEM 12: Lauren Turk is reviewing Francesca Toy’s financial statements in order to estimate its sustainable growth rate. Using the information presented in Exhibit 14.25.a. (1) Identify and calculate the three components of the DuPont formula.(2) Calculate the ROE for 2011, using the three components of the DuPont formula.(3) Calculate the sustainable-growth rate for 2011Thank you very much for responding to the topics in such great details. This is the same type of analysis that I expect from a case study. Here, you have examined the information presented in the videos and have crafted responses based on the videos. And, you only included an outside source to support one of your points. If you complete the assignments in a similar manner, you will do well. I’m pointing this out so that others can use your responses as examples of how to respond to case study questions. I want to touch on the drawbacks of horizontal integration that you mentioned. One of the factors that determine the success of horizontal integration is the level of strategic planning capabilities that the senior managers possess. In fact, superior strategic planning capabilities has to be one of the core competencies of the leading organization. If you look at the merger (now 3 years later), there are several things that SWA has done correctly. First, they acquired Airtran as a wholly owned subsidiary of SWA. As such, SWA owns 100% of the shares of Airtran. However, Airtran continued to operate as an independent entity. So, this minimizes the risks involved with synergies and the pitfalls with integration, such as the clash of cultures. Airtran continued to target the budget conscious business travelers while SWA continued to target cost conscious consumers. Though I haven’t done any research on this, I imagine that the salary structures in place for both airlines would continue. And, as the analyst reported in the video, SWA’s employees are paid very well, even though SWA is a low cost carrier. The two companies are scheduled to merge fully as one company by the end of 2014. After that time, we’ll see what the impact will be. Will the business customers that flew with Airtran now want to fly with SWA? What do you think? Clara, for the last section, on corporate level strategy, you have to state a corporate level strategy that is covered in Chapter 9. I’ll let you tell me, but what type of strategy did you actually propose in the last sentence especially?b. Turk has calculated actual and sustainable growth for each of the past four years and finds in each year that its calculated sustainable-growth rate substantially exceeds its actual growth rate. Cite two course of action (other than ignoring the problem) that Turk should encourage Francesca Toy to take, assuming the calculated sustainable-growth rate continue to exceed the actual rate.Exhibit 14.25 Francesca Toy, Inc: Actual 2010 and Estimated 2011 Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ending December 31 ($ Millions, except Per-Share Data)2010 2011e Change (%)Income statementRevenue $ 4,750 $ 5,140 7.5Coast of goods sold $ 2,400 $ 2,540Selling general, and administrative 1,400 1,550Depreciation 180 210Goodwill amortization 10 10——————————————————————-Operating income $ 760 $ 830 8.4Interest expense 20 25Income before taxes $ 740 $ 805Income taxes 265 295Net income $ 475 $ 510Earnings per share S 1.79 $ 1.96 8.6Average shares outstanding (mil) 265 260BALANCE SHEETCash $ 400 $ 400Accounts receivable $ 680 $ 700Inventories $ 570 $ 600Net property, and equipment $ 800 $ 870Intangibles $ 500 $ 530Total assets $ 2,950 $ 3,100Current liabilities $ 550 $ 600Long-term debt $ 300 $ 300Total liabilities $ 850 $ 900Stockholders’ equity $ 2,100 $ 2,200Total liabilities and equity $ 2,950 $ 3,100Book value per share $ 7.92 $ 8.46Annual dividend per share $ 0.55 $ 0.60
Team of Professional Essay Writers
Savvyessaywriters.net is a trusted essay service that connects learners seeking assistance with top-ranked experts. Every essay writer on our team has a unique rating based on the percentage of successful orders and customer reviews. Check out our pros’ profiles to hire the most suitable one.
